On this page · 4 sections
Generative AI is transforming industries, but it's also introducing a new attack surface. "Shadow AI" — employees pasting sensitive data into public chatbots — was the first wave of this risk. In 2026, the more consequential risk is autonomous agents with real tool access, which we cover in depth in our AI agent governance guide. This post focuses on securing the model layer itself.
The Top Risks in 2026
- Prompt Injection: Attackers manipulating the LLM to ignore instructions and reveal system prompts or sensitive data.
- Data Leakage: Sensitive RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) documents being surfaced to users who shouldn't have access permissions.
- Model Hallucinations: In regulated industries like healthcare and finance, a confident wrong answer is a liability.
- Agentic Tool Misuse: Agents with real API/database access taking unintended or unauthorized actions — an entirely new category that barely existed two years ago.
Securing the GenAI Stack
At Varcio, we implement a "Defense in Depth" strategy for our clients' GenAI applications, delivered through our AI & Generative AI engineering practice:
1. Input/Output Guardrails
We use tools like NeMo Guardrails to sanitize inputs before they reach the LLM. If a user tries to jailbreak the model, the guardrail intercepts the request. Similarly, output filters scan for PII (Personally Identifiable Information) before the response is sent back to the user.
2. Private VPC Deployment
Never send sensitive data to public API endpoints without a BAA. We deploy open-source models (like Llama or Mistral) inside the client's private VPC using AWS SageMaker or Azure AI Foundry, or route through enterprise-tier APIs like Azure OpenAI Service, which offers VNet integration and regional data residency guarantees. This ensures data never leaves your controlled environment.
3. RAG with ACL Awareness
When building RAG systems, the vector database must respect Access Control Lists (ACLs). If a junior analyst asks "What is the CEO's salary?", the retrieval system should only search documents they are authorized to view. This is the single most commonly missing control we find in client audits.
4. Agent-Level Governance
As agents move from answering questions to taking actions, security has to extend beyond the model itself to what the agent is allowed to touch. We built Warden specifically to give enterprises a central control tower for exactly this — registry, access policy, spend monitoring, and audit trail across every AI agent in the organization.
Conclusion
Security cannot be an afterthought. By embedding these controls into the design phase — and treating agent governance as a first-class discipline alongside model-level security — we enable enterprises to innovate with confidence. Talk to our AI engineering team for a security readiness review of your current or planned GenAI deployments.
Frequently asked questions
What is the single most important GenAI security control to implement first?
ACL-aware RAG retrieval. Input/output filters catch a lot, but if your retrieval layer doesn't respect existing access control lists, any employee can potentially surface any document through the right question — this is the control most often missing entirely in first-generation RAG deployments.
Can prompt injection attacks be fully prevented?
Not with 100% certainty using current techniques — this is an active area of research. The practical goal is defense in depth: guardrails, output filtering, least-privilege tool access, and human review for high-stakes actions, so a successful injection has limited blast radius rather than being fully preventable.
Do open-source models deployed in a private VPC eliminate data leakage risk?
They eliminate the specific risk of data leaving your environment to a third-party API, which is significant. They don't eliminate internal risks like ACL-unaware retrieval or agent tool misuse — those require the governance and access-control layers described below regardless of where the model runs.
